SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 626

JASWANT SINGH
Harjinder Singh @ Rajinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Karam Chand – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Ms. Amarjit Kaur Khurana, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Jaswant Singh, J (Oral) - CM No.5453-C/2012 has been filed under section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of 80 days delay in filing the appeal. The application is supported by an affidavit of the appellant.

For the reasons stated in the application, which are just and sufficient, the application is allowed and delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

CM No.5454-C/2012 is allowed and permission is granted to make good the deficiency in payment of Court fee.

CM No.5455-C/2012 has been filed under Order 41 Rule 5 RSA No.1971/2012(O&M) 2 CPC for stay of the impugned judgment and decree dated 15.10.2009 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Div.) Samrala.

RSA No.1971/2012.

Defendant no.1/appellant/vendor is in second appeal against the judgments and decrees passed by both the courts below whereby the suit filed by plaintiff Karam Chand(respondent no.1) for specific performance of the agreement to sell dated 3.12.2002 was decreed by the trial court and affirmed in appeal.

2. Facts necessary for adjudication of the present second appeal are that respondent no.1-Karam Chand (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) filed a suit for possession by way of specific








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top