Mr. Ranjit Singh, J.: - A Welfare Association formed by residents of Housing Board Colony, 10-A, Gurgaon, has filed this writ petition for quashing of letters issued by respondent No.2, ordering fresh election of the petitioner-Association. The election of respondent No.3 is also put to challenge through the present writ petition. It is stated that election for a term of two years was held on 28.3.2010, in which Bhupinder Singh Yadav was elected as President of the Society. Respondent No.3 made a complaint, when respondent No.2 asked the former President to submit complete election proceedings. The former President accordingly submitted the requisite information on 29.4.2010. Respondent No.2, however, sought some more information and, thus, started going into the validity of election. This is stated to be beyond his jurisdiction. Respondent No.2 has also issued letter for holding fresh election and the petitioner-Association has now challenged the same after serving a legal notice. Grievance is that respondent No.2 is not taking any cognizance or action on complaint and objection being filed by the petitioner-Association.

2. How a private Society formed by residents of a Housing Colony would be in a position to maintain a writ petition about the election dispute could not be explained by the counsel in any manner. In response to this query raised by the Court, what all the counsel could state was that it is a registered Society and hence, respondent No.2 would have no jurisdiction to interfere in the election, which has been validly held. Though, attention of the Court was not drawn to any provisions either of the Society Registration Act, 1860 or of bye-laws, which would govern the election of the Society but in the writ petition, reference has been made to Section 24 of the Society Registration (Haryana Amendment) Act, 2007 (for short, “the Act”). This Section appears to govern the dispute regarding election of office bearers. This Section reads as under:-

“Disputes regarding election of office-bearers-

(1)The prescribed authority may, on a reference made to it by the Registrar or by atleast one-fourth of the members of a Society registered in Haryana, hear and decide in a summary manner by doubt or dispute in respect of the election or continuance in office of an office-bearer of such society, and may pass such orders in respect thereof as it deems fit: Provided that the election of an office bearer shall be set aside where the prescribed authority is satisfied-

(a) that any corrupt practice has been committed by such bearer; or

(b) That the nomination of any candidate has been improperly rejected; or

(c) that the result of the election insofar as it concerns to such office-bearer has been materially affected by the improper acceptance of any nomination or by the improper reception, refusal or rejection of any vote or the receipt of any vote which is void or by any noncompliance with the provisions of any rules of the society.

Explanation:- A person shall be deemed to have committed a corrupt practice who, directly or indirectly, by himself or by any other person -

(i) induces, or attempts to induce, by fraud, intentional misrepresentation, coercion or threat or injury, any elector to give or to refrain from giving a vote in favour of any candidate, or any person to stand or not to stand, or to withdraw or not to withdraw from being a candidate at the election.

(ii) with a view to inducing any elector to give or to refrain from giving a vote in favour of any candidate, or to inducing any person stand or not to stand as, or to withdraw or not to withdraw from being a candidate at the election, offers or gives any money, or valuable consideration, or any place or employment, or holds out any promise of individual advantage or profit to any person;

(iii) abets (within the meaning of the India Penal Code) the doing of any of the acts specified in clauses (i) and (ii);

(iv) induces or attempts to induce a candidate or ele