Mr. Mehinder Singh Sullar, J. (Oral):- Concisely, the facts and material, culminating in the commencement, relevant for disposal of the instant petition for bail and emanating from the record are that, on 11.07.2012, in the wake of secret information, complainant-Mrs. Vijay Rani, Drug Control Officer and Mr.M.K.Bhadu, SMO, formed a raiding-party and conducted the search of the premises of Sharma Medical Agency, Dabwali, and recovered the following Narcotic drugs:-

S.No. Name of the Medicine Quantity(total) 1. Microlet tablets 15000 2. Lomotil tablets 20000 3. Rexc of syrup 480 bottles 4. Lupigesic injections 400 5. Unizocine injections 550 6. Zocin injections 900 7. Spasmocip capsules 1200 8. ZZZ tablets 1000 9. Zepose 10 Mg. 5000 tablets 10. Zepose 5 Mg. 3500 tablets 11. Decalm 10 Mg. 3150 tablets 12. Decalm 5 Mg. 700 tablets 13. Spasmocip Plus 3300 capsules 14. Rest 0.5 32400 tablets 15. Parvon Spas 6800 capsules 16. Anxipam 1100 tablets 17. Dexovon 390 capsules 18. Antipam 2 Mg. 94000 tablets 19. Spasmo Plus 6000 tablets 20. Unizocine injections(1 ml) 1000 21. Spasmo proxyon 6912 capsules 22. Spasmo 720 capsules 23. Spasmo Cip Plus 2700 capsules 24. Unizocine injections 200 25. Provon Fort 100 capsules 26. Fortvin injections 96 27. Momolit tablets 44000 28. Prozolam 0.5 Mg. 35400 29. Provon Spas capsules 21780 30. Pheuolit tablets 10000 31. Tranax 5600 32. Alto 0.5 Mg.tablets 8800 33. Spazpmoci Plus capsules 7200 34. Parvodex capsules 2000 35. Alto 0.5 Mg.tablets 144000 36. Proxyvon capsules 2160 37. Parvon capsules 2304 38. Altipam-2 tablets 78000 39. Corex syrup 25000 bottles 40. Fhenoltil tablets 25000 41. Alto 0.5 tablets 90400 42. Luzapalm tablets 5000 43. Rexcaf cough syrup(602 ml) 2880 bottles 44. Rexcaf cough syrup(100 ml) 480 bottles 45. Rexcaf cough syrup(100 ml) 3840 bottles 46. Kilcaf(100 ml) 330 bottles 47. Kilcaf(10 ml) 5 bottles

2. According to the complainant that, she demanded the relevant stock register and sale record etc., but the accused could not produce the same. Having completed all the codal formalities of taking the samples etc., the samples & remaining drugs were sealed into separate parcels and taken into possession vide recovery memos in the presence of the witnesses.

3. Levelling a variety of allegations and narrating the sequence of events, in all, the prosecution claimed that a huge catch of the indicated Narcotic drugs were recovered from the possession of the accused, without any valid permit, licence or relevant record. In the background of aforesaid allegations and in pursuance of the aforesaid recovery, the present criminal case was registered against the accused including the petitioner, by means of FIR No.288 dated 11.07.2012, on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under Sections 21/22/61/85 of The Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter to be referred as “the Act”), by the police of Police Station City Mandi Dabwali, District Sirsa.

4. Having exercised and lost his right of bail before the Sessions Judge, now the petitioner-accused has preferred the instant petition for regular bail in the indicated criminal case, invoking the provisions of Section 439 Cr.P.C.

5. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, going through the record with his valuable assistance and after considering the entire matter deeply, to my mind, there is no merit in the instant petition in this context.

6. Ex facie, the arguments of the learned counsel that, since the manufactured drugs were recovered, no pointed offences are made out and moreover, the recovery of commercial quantity of drugs is not duly proved, so, the petitioner is entitled to the concession of regular bail, are not only devoid of merit but misconceived as well.

7. As is evident from the record that, huge and commercial quantity of the above-mentioned Narcotic drugs were recovered from the possession of the petitioner-accused, without any permit or licence. From the lengthy contenti