A.N.JINDAL
State Bank of Patiala – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish Singh Khehar – Respondent
Mr. A.N. Jindal, J. (Oral):- Having remained unsuccessful before both the Courts, the State Bank of Patiala, decree holder-appellant (hereinafter referred as ‘the appellant’) has filed this execution second appeal.
2. The time lag in the matter under consideration is enormous. In the year 1984, M/s Shree Ganesh Sales, of which Himesh Sablok-respondent No.3 and Surinder Behal-respondent No.4 were partners, was granted cash credit facility to the tune of Rs.50,000/-. The allegations are that the said Himesh Sablok had hypothecated the property i.e. H.No.730, Sector 8-B, Chandigarh with the appellant as a credit security by depositing title deeds to obtain the said facility. Having failed to pay the loan amount, a civil suit No.161 was filed on 26.10.1987 for recovery of Rs.61,894-05 paise, under Order 34 read with Order 7 Rule 1 CPC. In the said suit, the defendants i.e. M/s Shree Ganesh Sales, Himesh Sablok and Surinder Behl were proceeded against exparte, whereas Sudhir Mahajan-respondent No.5 had contested the suit. The said suit resulted into a preliminary decree on 19.04.1989 for recovery of Rs.61,894.05 paise along with interest at the rate of 15½ % per annum since the
United Bank of India Ltd. v. Messrs Lekharam Sonaram and Co.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.