SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(P&H) 340

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Before
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih
C.W.P. No.7079 of 2013
Garib Dass & Ors.
v.
State of Punjab & Ors.
{Decided on 03/04/2013}

Advocates:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Ravi Kapur, Advocate and Ms. Surabhi Jain, Advocate.

Headnote:(A) Service Law--Departmental Proceedings--Quashing of--Pendency of criminal proceedings--Criminal case as well as departmental proceedings have been initiated against petitioners is more or less same--Held, merely because incident is one cannot be a ground for coming to a conclusion that petitioners would be prejudiced in case departmental enquiry is held against them before conclusion of criminal trial--By now, it is well settled principle of law that merely because criminal proceedings for same incident is pending against an employee that does not abrogate or foreclose an option for holding of departmental proceedings against those employees during pendency of criminal trial so as to give such an employee a free hand to continue with such misconduct in service till conclusion of trial in criminal case. (Para 6)

       (B) Service Law--Departmental Proceedings—During pendency of criminal proceedings--Held, ambit and mandate as also approach and objective of both criminal and departmental proceedings are different--In disciplinary proceedings, question is whether delinquent employee is guilty of conduct as would merit punishment under Service Rules whereas in criminal proceedings question is whether offence registered against him, if established, what sentence should be imposed upon him--Standard of proof, mode of enquiry and rules governing enquiry and trial are quite distinct and different--In present case, continuance of departmental proceedings against petitioners would not prejudice right of petitioners in criminal case as consequences are different and will not have an effect on each other. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT

Mr. Augustine George Masih, J. (Oral):- Petitioners have approached this Court praying for quashing of the details of allegations issued to them, copies of which have been appended as Annexures P-10 to P-17, charge-sheet (Annexures P-23 to P- 30) and the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the ground that the incident is common, out of which the allegations have been culled out for which criminal cases have also been registered which are pending trial. Prayer has also been made for staying the departmental proceedings during the pendency of the criminal trial.

2. Counsel for the petitioners contends that it came to light that some of the employees of District Police Office, S.B.S.Nagar, Accounts Branch, in connivance with the Treasury Officer, S.B.S.Nagar, had embezzled crores of rupees from the General Provident Fund of the police officials. The case is of a very serious nature. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division, Nawanshahr was directed by the Sr.Superintendent of Police, to conduct preliminary investigation in this case so that the truth may come to light and the detailed report be submitted to him regarding the officials and employees involved in the case. It was also ordered that if any embezzlement is found to have been committed, the period thereof be also highlighted therein.

3. On an enquiry conducted by the Deputy Superintendent of Police (D), S.B.S. Nagar, it came to light that Head Constable Satwinder Kumar, Head Constable Tirath Singh, Head Constable Gurdeep Singh, Head Constable Lal Chand-petitioner No.3 (Cashier), who were deputed in District Jalandhar, in connivance with the employees of the Treasury Office, Nawanshahr, under a planned conspiracy, by forging numbers and names of the police officers withdrew the amount of General Provident Fund under these names and numbers, prepared forged document and put forged signatures of the concerned Authority on these forged documents, took these forged bills to the Treasury Office by hand. One Narinder Kumar Babbar, employee of the Treasury Office used to issue cheque in respect of these bills and handed over the same to them which were got encashed by these police officials from the State Bank of India, Nawanshahr and they distributed the amount withdrawn amongst themselves. Thereafter, SI Garib Dass (petitioner No.1), Head Constable Charanjit Ram (petitioner No.3), Head Constable Kamal Kumar (petitioner No.2) came to know about this embezzlement and they also joined the earlier mentioned police officials and started getting share of the embezzled money. In this way, an amount of Rs. 1,40,74,350/- was withdrawn from the Treasury. But later on, when these employees came to know that the fraud has come to the notice of the Department, they collected the amount and deposited it back in the State Bank of India. This amount relates to the period for the years 2006 to 2009. On the basis of this enquiry report, FIR No.31 (Annexure P-6) dated 7.5.2012 Police Station City S.B.S.Nagar, stands registered. Another FIR No.56 (Annexure P-7) dated 22.6.2012 stands registered in Police Station City SBS Nagar against the petitioners and others, according to which the amount involved in the fraud is Rs. 9, 75,00,000/-. The allegations against the petitioners by and large are the same as in FIR No.31. On the basis of these FIRs, petitioners were placed under suspension. After investigation, the challans, copies of which have been appended as Annexures P-8 and P-9, stand submitted in the Competent Court. Without waiting for the outcome of the criminal case, a list of allegations along with the list of witnesses has been served upon the petitioners, copies of which have been appended as Annexures P-10 to P-17, which reveals that the charges are with regard to the same incident and the witnesses are also almost the same. The witnesses in the departmental proceedings are also witnesses in the criminal case; rather there are much more witnesses to be examined









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top