SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 195

INDERJIT SINGH
Karambir – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. H.N.Sahu, Advocate.
For the Respondent-State:Mr. Subhash Godara, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Inderjit Singh, J.:- Petitioner Karambir has preferred this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., seeking regular bail in case FIR No.223 dated 28.08.2013, registered at Police Station Pundri, District Kaithal, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 452, 307 IPC (Section 307 IPC added lateron).

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the injury with ‘danda’ is attributed to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further contended that it is a case of version and cross version and petitioner has also received injury.

3. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposed the bail application.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel and have gone through the record.

5. From the record, I find that firstly it is a case of version and cross version. It is also stated that persons, from the petitioner’s side, also received injuries. Though, the petitioner is stated to be the main accused but he was not armed with any deadly weapon. He was simply armed with ‘danda’ and inflicted ‘danda’ blow on the head of Sajjan Kumar, which injury has been declared as dangerous to life. The petitioner has also received injury. It is still to



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top