Mr. K. Kannan, J.: (Oral) - The appeal is for enhancement of compensation for the value of superstructure and the loss of business that were occasioned to the landowner. At the time when the property was acquired, the superstructure was a poultry farm which the landowner was running at the acquired property. The farm was situate in an extent of about 400 square yards in the village Tejli, District Yamuna Nagar.

2. The landowner contended that he had constructed the poultry shed only in the year 1988-89 and the property fell to be acquired and taken possession of in the year 1991. The landowner gave evidence as regards the valuation through a report of the building expert. The report was marked as P2 and the evidence of the expert was PW1. The report sets out the details of the construction, namely, of one office, one store, poultry shed, stairs, boundary wall, steel gate in the main entrance and brick paving in open yard. He had assessed the valuation at Rs.2,14,000/-. While giving evidence as regards this, no more than a mere suggestion was put to the witness that he had given an exaggerated valuation. Nothing was elicited in the cross-examination that any of the valuatio