Mr. Surya Kant, J.:- This order shall dispose of CWP Nos. 19096, 21403 to 21411 and 23331 of 2011 and also CWP Nos. 2631 and 2654 of 2013 as on the point of commonality, all these cases lay challenge to the notifications dated 11th April, 2002 and 08th April, 2003 issued under Sections 4 and 6 as well as notices like dated 04th March, 2005 issued under Section 9, followed by the Award dated 06th April, 2005 passed under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 mostly on the similar and over-lapping grounds. While the facts of the lead case are being referred to extensively, the distinguishable facts of connected cases are also briefly noticed.

CWP NO. 19096 OF 2011 [Sant Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors.]

2. The three writ petitioners are sons of Ishwar Singh, residents of village Garhi Bohar, District Rohtak. They impugn the above mentioned notifications, notice and the Award as their land, fully described in Para No. 1 of the writ petition, situated in the revenue estate of their village is a part of the impugned acquisition. Besides alleging that the impugned acquisition is hit by various Articles such as Article 14, 19, 21 and 31 of the Constitution, they al