SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 401

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Raghbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Baljit Singh Buttar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. Baltej Singh Sidhu, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.:- This order shall dispose of three appeals bearing RSA Nos.1939, 2235 and 2236 of 2013 as the issue involved in all these appeals is common.

2. The plaintiff-appellant filed suit for recovery of Rs.25 lacs as damages/compensation alleging that he is well respected and well to do citizen of the country whose political and social image has been tarnished by the defendants by entering his name in the Surveillance Register No.X kept under Rule 23.4 of the Punjab Police Rules, Volume-III, in Police Station Gidderbaha and vide letter dated 26.06.1997 addressed by defendant no.2 to defendant no.1, history sheet of the plaintiff was opened by informing defendant no.1 about the registration of various cases against the plaintiff recommending that name of the plaintiff be put in Basta ‘B’ of Police Station Gidderbaha and defendant no.1, without getting the matter inquired into, accepted the recommendation with mala fide intention by writing the words “Parvangi Ditti Jandi Hai” (English translation means “accepted”), without forming an opinion that the plaintiff was reasonably believed to be an habitual offender etc.

3. The Trial Court decreed the suit hold











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top