SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(P&H) 963

RAJIVE BHALLA, REKHA MITTAL
Varinder Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


For the Petitioners:Mr. Arun Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mahavir Sandhu, Advocate.
For the Petitioner(s) in CWP No.1028
and 1030 of 2012:Mr. V.K. Sachdeva, Advocate.
For the Respondent nos. 1 to 3:Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Addl. Advocate General,Punjab.
For the Respondent no.3 In CWP Nos.4553,
4556, 4569, 4572, 4573,4593, 4599, 4608,
4609, 4612, 4613, 4614, 4615, 4616, 4617,
4618, 4619, 4620, 4621, 4624, 4628, 4666,
4667,4669, 4671, 4672, 4698, 5161, 5235,
5240, 5381,5393 and 5463 of 2012:Mr. Dhirinder Chopra, Advocate.
For the Respondent no.4 in CWP Nos.7003,
10170, 14572, 11669, 11670, 14799 of 2011
and CWP Nos,1028 and 1030 of 2012:Mr. J.R.Mittal, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Kashmir Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent nos. 6 & 7 in
CWP No.7003 of 2011:Mr. S.K.Singla, Advocate.
For the Petitioners in Civil Writ Petition
Nos.6514,6515,6516,6517, 6518, 6519,
6520, 6521 and 6523 of 2013:Mr. Arun Palli, Senior Advocate with Mr. P.C. Chaudhary and Munish Jolly. Advocates.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Rajive Bhalla, J.: - By way of this judgment, we shall dispose of Civil Writ Petition Nos. 7003, 10170, 11669, 11670, 14572 and 14799 of 2011, 1028, 1030, 4553, 4556, 4569, 4572, 4573, 4593, 4598, 4599, 4604, 4608, 4609, 4612, 4613, 4614, 4615, 4616, 4617, 4618, 4619, 4620, 4621, 4624, 4628, 4666,4667, 4669, 4671, 4672, 4698, 5058, 5068, 5070, 5073, 5125, 5161, 5235, 5240, 5381, 5393 and 5463 of 2012 6514, 6515, 6516, 6517, 6518, 6519, 6520, 6521 and 6523 of 2013. as counsel for the parties agree that these petitions involve adjudication of common questions of law and the fact and whether filed under Section 11 or Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “1961 Act”), have to be decided together.

2. Counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are, admittedly, proprietors and residents of village Bankharpur, Tehsil Derabassi, District SAS Nagar, Mohali. The land in dispute is “Shamilat Patti” and as it is not used as per revenue record for the benefit of the village community or a part thereof or for common purposes of the village, it is excluded from “Shamilat Deh”. The Gram Panchayat sought to inter










































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top