Mr. K. Kannan, J. (Oral). - The two revisions are against the order passed by the trial Court allowing for two only of witnesses out of 9 persons cited to be examined as witnesses for the 7th defendant. The 7th defendant is the mother of the plaintiff and she was impleaded on an application filed by the principal contesting defendant, namely, the grand mother of the plaintiff. The suit relates to a claim for succession to the estate of Chaudhry Bansi Lal and to the estate of his son Surender Singh, the father of the plaintiff and the husband of the subsequently impleaded 7th defendant. The impleadment of the 7th defendant had been ordered by this Court and in the course of trial the plaintiff has examined herself and also the witnesses. The suit hinges on alleged Wills said to have been executed by Chaudhry Bansi Lal and Sh.Surender Singh. It appears that the plaintiff has also attempted to bring proof of the genuineness of the signatures found in the alleged Wills. In the course of trial the 7th defendant who has supported the plaintiff has sought permission to cross examine the plaintiff but the trial court earlier rejected the prayer on an observation that the 7the defe