SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 575

INDERJIT SINGH
Varinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Jaswinder Kaur – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. J.S. Brar, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Inderjit Singh, J.:- Petitioner Varinder Kaur has filed this revision petition against Jaswinder Kaur and other respondents under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 27.01.2014 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Patiala and later on confirmed in appeal vide order dated 11.07.2014 by learned Addl. District Judge, Patiala, whereby application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC filed by the plaintiff/petitioner was dismissed.

2. Notice of motion was issued and respondents appeared through their counsel and contested the petition.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record.

4. From the record, I find that Varinder Kaur plaintiff has filed a suit against her sisters Jaswinder Kaur, Harminder Kaur, Sukhpal Kaur and Gurpreet Kaur for declaration to the effect that plaintiff is exclusive owner in possession of Kothi No.325 measuring 269 sq. yards as described in the head note of the plaint and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering in any manner in the peaceful possession or making any agreement or alienating or selling or creating any type of charge u








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top