IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Before
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Sanghi
CRA-S. No. 453-SB-2001 (O&M)
Balinder Singh
v.
State of Haryana
{Decided on 08/05/2014}
(A) Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, S.50--Personal Search--Acquittal--In the notice to accused u/s 50, the words “to be searched before a Magistrate” were clearly missing--Held; appellant was not informed to the appellant that he could be produced before the Magistrate and Investigating officer himself offered to the appellant to be searched by him--Therefore, there was complete non-compliance of S.50--Accused acquitted. (Para 21)
(B) Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, S.50--Personal Search--Acquittal--Contention that contraband was recovered from bag carried by appellant therefore, compliance of S.50 was not necessary--Held; that if the search would have been limited to the extent of search of bag, then there was no requirement of compliance of Section 50, but if the person of the appellant was subsequently searched, in that eventuality the mandate of Section 50 of the NDPS Act was to be complied with. (Para 23)
(C) Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, S.50--Personal Search--Acquittal--Chance Recovery--Once the investigating officer has opted to comply with the provisions of S.50 by issuing notice, then it was obligatory for him to adhere to the same in letter and spirit and its non-compliance would led to acquittal of accused. (Para 24)
Mr. Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.: - Challenge in this criminal appeal is to the judgment of conviction dated 16.2.2001 and the order of sentence dated 19.2.2001, passed by the learned Judge, Special Court, Karnal, whereby the appellant, Balinder Singh, was held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity, ‘the NDPS Act’), and ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years besides payment of fine of Rs.1,00,000/- and in default thereof to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for two and a half years.
2. Brief facts of the case are that on 13.2.1997, the then ASI Manvir Singh (PW8) along with fellow police officials was proceeding towards village Kaimla in Government Jeep bearing registration No. HNL-7123. Under his supervision a barrier was laid and the checking party started inspecting the vehicles passing therethrough. PW3 Mahinder Singh, resident of village Bastara, came there and in the meantime, the appellant also emerged there with a gunny bag on motorcycle bearing registration No. HR-05-C-5670. PW8 ASI Manvir Singh suspected some contraband in the gunny bag. He (ASI Manvir Singh) disclosed his identity to the appellant and thereafter a notice under Section 50 of the NDPS Act asking the appellant whether he wanted to get the search effected from him (PW8 ASI Manvir Singh) or before any Gazetted Officer was served. The appellant opted for being searched in the presence of some Gazetted Officer and, as such, he (appellant) was produced before PW4 Sukhdev Singh, who was then posted as Deputy Superintendent of Police, Assandh, when he was available near the Bus Stand, Karnal. On direction of PW4 Sukhdev Singh, the search of the gunny bag being carried by the appellant on his motorcycle, was conducted and it was found that the bag was containing 35 Kgs. of poppy husk. 200 grams of the poppy husk was taken out of the bag for the purpose of sampling. The parcel of the poppy husk drawn for sampling was prepared and the same was sealed with the seal ‘RS’. The bag containing remaining poppy husk was also sealed. Sample parcel as well as bag containing residue poppy husk were taken into possession vide recovery memo. Ex. PC. The motorcycle was also taken into police possession vide recovery memo. Ex. PD. PW8 ASI Manvir Singh sent a memo. (Ex. PE) to the Police Station, Gharaunda, for registration of the case, on the basis of which formal FIR (Ex.PE/1) was registered by PW6 Inspector Ram Sarup. PW6 Inspector Ram Sarup also made endorsement (Ex. PE/2) on the police memo (Ex.PE) and reached the spot where other police officials along with appellant were already present. PW8 ASI Manvir Singh produced the witnesses and the case property before PW6 Ram Sarup, Station House Officer, who, in turn, verified the fact of recovery and put his seal bearing letters ‘SD’ on both the packets. PW6 Ram Sarup also prepared the rough site plan (Ex. PH) and recorded the statements of witnesses. The appellant was arrested and thereafter he was personally searched, but nothing was recovered from his person.
3. After completion of the investigation on the spot, the police party along with the appellant arrived at the Police Station, Gharaunda. PW8 ASI Manvir Singh deposited the case property with the Moharrir Head Constable, Ramesh Kumar (PW2).
4. After completion of the investigation, the charge-sheet (report under Section 173 Cr.P.C.) for prosecution of the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 15 of the NDPS Act was presented. A copy of the charge-sheet along with its enclosures was supplied to the appellant free of cost. Finding a prima facie case, he was charge-sheeted for the offence punishable under Section 15 of the NDPS Act, to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. In order to substantiate its allegations, the prosecution examined the following witnesses:-
PW1 SI Sajjan Kumar: He had prepared the report under Section 173, Cr.P.C., afte
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.