KULDIP SINGH
Harjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
Mr. Kuldip Singh, J.: - Petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 1.8.2014 (Annexure P1), passed by the District Magistrate, Ludhiana, wherein parole to the present petitioner was not recommended. Consequently, the petitioner was not released on parole for four weeks.
2. The petitioner was convicted by the learned Judge, Special Court, Ludhiana under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 in FIR No.95 dated 28.4.2008 registered at Police Station Jagraon and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and pay fine of Rs.1 lacs and in default thereof, to further undergo RI for one year. Criminal Appeal CRA- S-1285-SB of 2011 against the said judgment is pending. Previously, the petitioner had availed parole from 11.4.2012 to 12.5.2012 under the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962 (for short ‘the Act’). The Superintendent of Central Jail, Ludhiana for the second time, initiated the regular four weeks parole, for the petitioner to meet his family. However, the District Magistrate has reported that accused/petitioner may deal in smuggling of narcotics. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.