SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 690

KULDIP SINGH
Harjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. A.S. Trikha, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Ashish Sanghi, DAG Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Kuldip Singh, J.: - Petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 1.8.2014 (Annexure P1), passed by the District Magistrate, Ludhiana, wherein parole to the present petitioner was not recommended. Consequently, the petitioner was not released on parole for four weeks.

2. The petitioner was convicted by the learned Judge, Special Court, Ludhiana under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 in FIR No.95 dated 28.4.2008 registered at Police Station Jagraon and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and pay fine of Rs.1 lacs and in default thereof, to further undergo RI for one year. Criminal Appeal CRA- S-1285-SB of 2011 against the said judgment is pending. Previously, the petitioner had availed parole from 11.4.2012 to 12.5.2012 under the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962 (for short ‘the Act’). The Superintendent of Central Jail, Ludhiana for the second time, initiated the regular four weeks parole, for the petitioner to meet his family. However, the District Magistrate has reported that accused/petitioner may deal in smuggling of narcotics. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top