SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 168

RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
Sube Singh – Appellant
Versus
Shanti Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vivek Khatri, Advocate.
For the Respondent Nos.1 to 4:Mr. B.S. Bairagi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Rajiv Narain Raina, J.: - The challenge in this petition is to the order dated 17th January, 2013 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Hisar directing plaintiff Nos.1 and 2 and defendant No.1 to appear before the Forensic Science Laboratory, Maduban, Karnal to give blood sample for DNA profiling test at the expense of the plaintiffs. The parties were directed to appear on 20th February, 2013 for drawing blood sample.

2. The dispute in the suit is with respect to rights and shares in the suit property. The suit instituted by the petitioner is for declaration of ownership and possession to the extent indicated in the head note to the plaint. The family pedigree table is found at page 25 of the paper book.

3. Plaintiff No.1 Shanti Devi asserts that she and her late sister Kesho were born from the marriage of Birsala @ Risala and Nikia Devi. After the death of Birsala @ Risala their mother Nikia Devi married Vijay Singh @Baje Singh brother of Birsala. Indisputably, from the second marriage, Sube Singh/defendant No.1 and late Harish Chander were born. Therefore, Shanti Devi, late Kesho, Sube Singh and late Harish Chander were born from the same womb of Ni




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top