SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 169

PARAMJEET SINGH
Charanjit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. V.S. Rana, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Paramjeet Singh, J.: - This regular second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 02.04.2012 passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Ludhiana whereby suit for declaration, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction filed by appellant-plaintiff has been dismissed and against the judgment and decree dated 09.01.2014 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana whereby appeal preferred by the appellant-plaintiff has also been dismissed.

2. For convenience sake, reference to parties is being made as per their status in the suit.

3. The detailed facts are already recapitulated in the judgments of the courts below and are not required to be reproduced. However, the brief facts, as pleaded in plaint are to the effect that plaintiff is consumer of electric connection No.SR-71/407 SP and defendants are supplier of electricity against consideration. The plaintiff is making payment of each and every consumption bill and nothing is due against him. It was further pleaded that during the period of 11.08.2008 to 23.08.2008, plaintiff was out of station. All of sudden, the defendants had raised demand of Rs.2,91,948/- on the basis of concocted charges






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top