SURYA KANT, AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Sanjay Malhotra – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
SURYA KANT, J.
This order shall dispose of CWP Nos. 6565 of 1991 and 8600 of 2000 as both the writ petitions have been preferred by the same set of petitioners, who impugn two different acquisition proceedings insofar as the same pertain to acquisition of their land by the State of Haryana. Since some of the issues are overlapping, we propose to decide both the cases together. For better appreciation of the controversy, the facts of both the cases are noticed separately.
2. Petitioners No. 1 and 2 are brothers, while petitioner No.3 is their mother. They impugn the notifications dated 20th August, 1980 and 13th July, 1982 issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [in short 'the Act'] as also the notice under Section 9 issued in April, 1991 asking them to appear and file their objections, if any, on 03rd May, 1991 in respect of assessment of compensation for their acquired land comprising Khasra Nos. 121//19/1, 22, 26 situated in the revenue estate of village Jagadhri, Tehsil Jagadhri, District Yamuna Nagar.
3. The petitioners' case is that they are running a factory in the name of Maurya Timbers in the Industrial Area, Yamuna Nagar where various types
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.