SABINA
Cenlub Engineers – Appellant
Versus
Master Nimit – Respondent
Sabina, J.
Respondent had filed the petition under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973 seeking ejectment of the petitioner on the ground of non-payment of rent.
Petitioner, in its reply, denied the relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties. It was further averred that the respondent was not the owner of the property in question. It was averred that the lease deed dated 1.12.1986 was bogus document and was liable to be declared as null and void.
On the pleadings of the parties, following issues were framed by the Rent Controller:-
1. Whether the respondent is a tenant under the petitioner vide lease deed dated 1.12.86 on the monthly rent of Rs. 1600/- as alleged ? OPP
2. Whether the respondent has failed to pay the arrears of rent from April 2001 to November 2002, if so, to what effect? OPP
3. Whether the petition is not maintainable in the present form ? OPD
4. Whether the petitioner has no locus standi to file the present petition ? OPD
5. Whether the petitioner has no cause of action to file the present petition ? OPD
6. Whether the court has no jurisdiction to try the present petition ? OPD
7. Whether the petition is bad for mis-joi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.