2013 Supreme(P&H) 1293
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J.
Harbans Singh @ Kala - Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.409-SB of 2001
Decided on: 26.09.2013
Advocate Appeared
Ms. Shivya Sehgal, Advocate/amicus curiae, for the appellant.
Mr. Luvinder Sofat, AAG, Punjab.
Compliance with procedural requirements under the NDPS Act, including timely actions, independent witnesses, and proper documentation, is crucial for establishing a case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Headnote:
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Conviction under Section 18 - Summary of Acts and Sections: NDPS Act, Section 18, Section 52, Section 54, Section 55, Section 57 - The court discussed the provisions of the NDPS Act, including the requirements for arrest, seizure, and production of case property, and highlighted the mandatory nature of these provisions. The court emphasized the importance of compliance with procedural requirements and the impact of inordinate delays and lack of independent witnesses on the prosecution's case.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was convicted for possession of opium under Section 18 of the NDPS Act based on a recovery made by the police. The appellant denied the allegations, claiming false implication due to a family dispute.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt due to inordinate delay in sending samples for analysis, lack of independent witnesses, failure to connect the recovered scooter to the accused, and non-compliance with procedural requirements under the NDPS Act.
Issues: Inordinate delay in sending samples, lack of independent witnesses, failure to connect recovered scooter to the accused, non-compliance with procedural requirements under the NDPS Act
Ratio Decidendi: The inordinate delay in sending samples, lack of independent witnesses, and failure to comply with procedural requirements rendered the prosecution's case doubtful and led to the acquittal of the accused.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, the conviction and sentence were set aside, and the accused was acquitted of the charges.
JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J.
The present appeal assails the judgment and order dated 05.03.2001, passed by the learned Judge, Special Court, Ludhiana, (hereinafter referred to as the trial Court), whereby, the appellant, Harbans Singh @ Kala, has been convicted for commission of offence punishable under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period 10 years and to pay a fine of Rupees one lac, and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years.
2. The brief facts of the present case as narrated in para 2 of the impugned judgment, are reproduced as under:
“2. The prosecution case is that on 1.03.95, a police party headed by PW5 Inspector Jarnail Singh, the Investigating officer and consisting inter alia of PW4 ASI Rajinderpal Singh, was present alongwith Allwyn Nissan official vehicle bearing Regn. No.PB10B9456, in connection with Nakabandi (picketing), on that point of the culvert of the canal minor within the area of Village Sarabha, from where a metalled road goes from Vill. Pakhowal to Ludhiana. At about 2 a.m., the accused was seen coming on scooter bearing Regn. No. PJB3344 from the side of Vill. Leel on the embankment of the canal minor. The Investigating officer gave a signal to the accused with a light to stop. Instead of stopping, the accused turned back the scooter and tried to escape. He was apprehended on suspicion. The Investigating officer told the accused that it was suspected that he was in possession of opium and gave him an offer of search before a Gazetted officer or a magistrate. The accused reposed trust in the Investigating officer. His statement Ex.PD was recorded, which was attested by the Investigating officer, ASI Rajinderpal Singh, ASI Darshan Singh and signed by the accused. Thereafter, the Investigating officer searched the scooter of the accused. A faded jhola (bag) was found lying near the foot brake of the scooter. It was searched and found to contain opium wrapped in a glazed paper. Two samples of 10 gms. each out of the same were separated and put in separate empty match boxes. The remaining opium was weighed and found to be 5 kgs. 230 gms., which was wrapped in glazed paper and put in a separate empty tin container. Parcels of the samples and the bulk were prepared which were sealed at the spot by the Investigating officer with his seal bearing letters JS and along with the chits containing specimen impressions of the seal including chit Ex.P1 and the jhola were taken into possession vide memo Ex.PE, which was attested by the Investigating Officer and the aforesaid witnesses. The seal after use was handed over to ASI Rajinderpal Singh. The Investigating officer then sent ruqa Ex.PB to the police station through C. Jagdish Singh on the basis of which formal FIR Ex.PB/1 was recorded by SI Sakattar Singh. The Investigating officer also prepared rough site plan of the place of recovery Ex.PG. Currency notes of Rs.28/were recovered from the personal search of the accused, which were taken into possession vide memo Ex.PF, which was signed by the accused and attested by the Investigating officer and the witnesses. The Investigating officer also furnished ground of arrest to the accused orally. On reaching the police station, the Investigating officer deposited the case property and the chits with MHC Devinder Singh. On the same day, the Investigating officer took the case property from the said MHC and produced it alongwith the accused before the Magistrate vide his application Ex.PH on which the Magistrate passed order Ex.PH/1 and then returned the case property to the Investigating Officer. Thereafter, the Investigating officer deposited the case property with the said MHC. The scooter was taken into possession u/s 102 of the Cr.P.C. One of the two sample parcels was got tested from the Forensic Science Lab., Pb. Chandigarh and vide its report Ex.PJ was opined to be opiu