ARUN PALLI, J.

We are seized of an intra-court appeal, under Clause X of the Letters Patent, against the judgment rendered by the learned Single Judge.

Matter in hand is an offshoot of an infamous “Chandigarh Teachers Recruitment Scam”. Finding, that there were mass scale bungling in the selection of teachers, the appellant filed a complaint with the CBI (respondent No.1). CBI held a preliminary inquiry and probed the matter at some length. Eventually, only a report was sent to the Chief Vigilance Officer (Chandigarh), recommending certain corrective steps. However, pursuant to a complaint received by the Chandigarh Police, an FIR was registered in the matter and the same being investigated.

The appellant sought certain documents along with a complete information, from respondent No.1, in relation to the complaint he had made. Initially, respondent No.1 had decided to supply the information sought for by the appellant. However, subsequently the same was denied on the ground that a petition bearing number CWP No.17021 of 2009 – Karamjit Singh v. Union of India and others, was pending before this Court, wherein, a direction was being prayed to hand over the investigation bein