2013 Supreme(P&H) 1343
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Laxmi Narain Mittal, J.
Hardam Singh - Appellant
Vs.
Angrej Singh and Others - Respondent
Civil Revision No. 7753 of 2012
Decided On: 22.07.2013
Advocate Appeared
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff:Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate
For Respondents/Defendant:Mr. B.R. Mahajan, Advocate for Respondents No. 12 to 14
Headnote:
Court Fee - Suit Land - The court determined the market value of the suit land for the purpose of court fee, highlighting the application of Section 7(v) of the Court Fee Act, 1870 and the determination of market value for agricultural land.
Fact of the Case:
Plaintiffs filed a suit seeking declaratory reliefs, possession of the suit land, and permanent injunction. Defendants sought rejection of the plaint due to non-payment of court fee on the market value of the suit land.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that plaintiffs were not liable to pay ad-valorem court fee on the sale consideration recited in the sale deeds under challenge. However, they were liable to pay court fee on the ad-valorem value of the suit land for the relief of possession, determined at ten times the land revenue for agricultural land.
Issues: Determination of court fee on the market value of the suit land and the basis for determining the market value as per Section 7(v) of the Court Fee Act, 1870.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh Vs. Randhir Singh 2010(2) Law Herald (SC) 1371 to establish the plaintiffs' liability for court fee. Additionally, the court interpreted Section 7(v) of the Court Fee Act, 1870 to determine the market value of agricultural land for court fee purposes.
Final Decision: The court modified the trial court's order and directed the plaintiffs to pay ad-valorem court fee on the determined market value of the suit land, as well as requisite court fee for the reliefs of declaration and injunction.
Laxmi Narain Mittal, J.
1. Hardam Singh plaintiff No. 10 has approached this Court by way of instant revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugning order dated 26.11.2012 (Annexure P-1) passed by the trial Court thereby directing the plaintiffs (petitioner and pro-forma respondents No. 17 to 30) to pay ad-valorem court fee on market value of the suit land as per collector rates. Plaintiffs have filed suit against respondents No. 1 to 16-defendants seeking declaratory reliefs, besides relief of possession of the suit land if plaintiffs are not found in possession thereof. Plaintiffs have also claimed permanent injunction.
2. Defendants No. 1 to 4 filed application under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for rejection of the plaint on the ground that plaintiffs have not paid court fee on the market value of the suit land which according to transfer deeds challenged in the suit is more than Rs. two crores.
3. The plaintiffs by filing reply opposed the aforesaid application and pleaded that proper court fee has been paid.
4. Learned trial Court vide order (Annexure P-1) directed the plaintiffs to pay ad-valorem court fee on the market value of the suit land as per collector rates. Feeling aggrieved, plaintiff No. 10 has filed this revision petition to challenge the said order.
5. I have heard counsel for the parties and perused the case file.
6. Admittedly, the sale deeds/transfer deeds challenged in the suit were not executed by the plaintiffs. In other words, plaintiffs were not party to the said deeds. Consequently, in view of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh Vs. Randhir Singh 2010(2) Law Herald (SC) 1371, plaintiffs are not liable to pay ad-valorem court fee on sale consideration recited in the sale deeds under challenge.
7. However, in view of Section 7(v) of the Court Fee Act, 1870, plaintiffs are liable to pay court fee on ad-valorem value of the suit land for the relief of possession. The question to be determined, however, is as to what would be the market value of the suit land for this purpose. The trial Court has directed the plaintiffs to pay ad-valorem court fee on the market value of the suit land as per collector rates. However, there is no basis for order of the trial Court regarding collector rates of the suit land. On the contrary, according to Section 7(v) of the Court Fee Act, 1870, in case of agricultural land, the market value shall be ten times the land revenue of the land. In the instant case also, the suit land is agricultural land.
8. Consequently, market value of the suit land has to be determined at ten times the land revenue thereof and on the value so determined, the ad-valorem court fee shall be payable. In addition to it, plaintiffs have to pay requisite court fee for the reliefs of declaration and injunction. It is ordered accordingly in modification of impugned order Annexure P-1 passed by the trial Court. Disposed of accordingly.
Disposed off