JITENDRA CHAUHAN
Satish – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
Jitendra Chauhan, J.
1. This judgment shall dispose of two CRA Nos. S-2393-SB of 2011, filed by appellant Satish and S-159-SB of 2012, filed by appellant Ramesh, against the judgment/order dated 24/27.8.2011, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Hisar convicted and sentenced the appellants Satish and Ramesh, under sections 363/366/34 IPC and 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code. Under Section 376(2)(g), they were sentenced to undergo R.I. often years and to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/- each; in default of payment of fine, to further undergo RI for three months; under section 366 IPC, they were convicted and sentenced for a period of four years and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- each and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo R.I. for one month and under section 363 IPC, they were convicted and sentenced to undergo R.I. for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- each and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo R.I. for one month. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. In brief, the case of the prosecution is that on 19.8.2009, complainant Baljeet Singh filed a complaint with Incharge, Police Post, Azad Nagar that his d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.