SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 878

KARAM CHAND PURI
Baghel Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff:R.P. Dhir and J.B.S. Gill, Advocates.
For Respondents/Defendant:Ajaib Singh, Additional Advocate General.

JUDGMENT

Karam Chand Puri, J.

1. Baghel Singh - appellant before this Court was put to trial for offence under Section 307, 326, 324 IPC vide FIR No. 12 dated 10.2.2002, by the SHO of Police Station Garshankar. Learned trial Court after trial, acquitted the accused in respect of offence under Section 307 IPC. However, he was convicted for offence under Section 326 IPC and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month, vide judgment and order dated 28.8.2003 passed by Sh. Surjit Singh, Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc), Hoshiarpur. Feeling dissatisfied with the abovesaid judgment of conviction, Baghel Singh appellant has preferred the present appeal.

2. During the pendency of the appeal, C.R.M. No. 3318 of 2014 has been filed to the effect that the matter has been compromised. Copy of the compromise was given to the State counsel.

3. Learned State counsel was asked to file reply. Reply has not been filed.

4. Counsel for the complainant has placed on record affidavit of Ravinder Singh complainant, wherein it is mentioned that parties have arriv



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top