SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(P&H) 1448

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, JASPAL SINGH
Priyanka – Appellant
Versus
Jai Bhagwan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Ms. Neeru Bansal, Advocate
For the Respondent: None.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Jaspal Singh, J.:- The present appeal has been preferred by Smt. Priyanka (wife) feeling aggrieved against the judgment and decree dated January 22, 2011 whereby the petition filed under Section 13 (i)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’) as amended up-to-date for dissolution of marriage between the parties, was dismissed.

2. The brief facts of the case contained in the petition are that her marriage was solemnized with the respondent on June 20, 2009 at village Nimali according to Hindu rites and ceremonies. The marriage was consummated but no child was born out of their wedlock. It has been alleged by her that the respondenthusband and his family members started maltreating, abusing, harassing and beating her as they were not satisfied with the dowry given at the time of her marriage being greedy person. They also compelled and coerced her to bring money from her parents so that he may quench the lust of his drinking. Even he also raised a demand of a motorcycle and on failure to meet his demand, she was made to suffer mental as well as physical cruelty. For sometime, she tolerated all these sufferings just to keep peace in the family but the re


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top