SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 1676

L.N.MITTAL
Rajinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Darshan Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 1:Mr. DS Gurna, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. L.N. Mittal, J. (Oral) - CM No. 5877.CII of 2012

The application is allowed and Annexures P/4 to P/6 are taken on record subject to all just exceptions without commenting anything on merits of the revision petition.

CR No. 537 of 2010

Defendant no. 2 Rajinder Kaur has filed this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing order dated 21.3.2006 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ludhiana and judgment dated 23.9.2009 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana thereby dismissing application of defendant no. 2 – petitioner for setting aside ex parte judgment and decree dated 21.8.2001 passed against her.

2. Respondent no. 1 – plaintiff filed suit against M/s Dhaliwal Trading Agency as defendant no. 1 and against Rajinder Kaur (petitioner) her husband Avtar Singh, Kulwant Kaur and her husband Dalbir Singh as defendant no. 2 to 5 alleging that they were partners of defendant no. 1 – Firm. In the said suit, defendants no. 4 and 5 appeared for themselves as well as for defendant no. 1 whereas defendants no. 2 and 3 were proceeded against ex parte. The suit was decreed by the trial court vide judgment and decree














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top