SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 1689

NAWAB SINGH
Sukhwinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Amarjit Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Nawab Singh J., (Oral):- This defendant No.4’s revision is directed against the order dated March 25th, 2011 (Annexure P-5) passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana whereby application filed by the defendants No.1, 3 and 4 under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure for rejection of plaint, was dismissed.

2. Amarjit Singh-plaintiff-respondent No.1 filed suit for possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell dated July 22nd, 2008 executed by Sangeeta-defendant No.1 through her attorney Sharanjit Singh Sodhi in favour of the plaintiff with respect to the property mentioned in the head note of the plaint. The plaintiff also sought a decree of declaration to the effect that sale deed dated December 20th, 2010 subsequently executed by defendant No.1 in favour of defendants No.3 and 4 be declared null and void. A decree of permanent injunction was also sought against the defendants.

3. During pendency of suit, the defendants moved application (Annexure P-3) seeking rejection of the plaint on the ground that the agreement to sell in question contains a recital that the possession of property in dispute has been delivered to the plaintiff. He












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top