SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 1086

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Shyam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Madan Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Kul Bhushan Sharma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.: - This petition is filed against the order dated 16.08.2014, allowing the application filed by the defendants under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (here-in-after referred to as the “CPC”), setting aside the ex parte order dated 28.06.2007 and ex parte judgment and decree dated 17.03.2008.

2. The plaintiff-petitioner filed the suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 11.05.2007 for a sum of Rs.6,45,000/- in respect of land measuring 3 kanal 17 marlas, out of which Rs.6,00,000/- was paid as advance and the remaining amount was agreed to be paid at the time of execution of sale deed. In the said suit, the defendant was allegedly served through the Process Server and proceeded against ex parte on 28.06.2007, followed by ex parte judgment and decree dated 17.03.2008.

3. The defendant Rati Ram filed the application under Order 9 Rule 13 of the CPC for setting aside both the aforesaid orders dated 28.06.2007 and 17.03.2008 alleging that he acquired the knowledge of the ex parte decree on 28.08.2008 when he received the notice from the Collector under Section 9 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (here-in-after refe







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top