Mr. Mehinder Singh Sullar, J.: (Oral) - The epitome of the facts and material, culminating in the commencement, relevant for deciding the instant petition to quash the impugned order dated 10.2.2009 of trial court & judgment dated 9.9.2011 of revisional Court and emanating from the record, is that, respondent-accused Shoe Narain alias Sheo Narain was the owner of land in question. He agreed to sell the same for a total consideration of Rs.5 lacs to petitioner-complainant Deegh Ram son of Hari Singh (for brevity “the complainant”). Having received an amount of Rs.2,50,000/- as earnest money, an agreement to sell dated 20.6.2002 (Ex.PW3/A) was executed in his (complainant) favour by the respondent-accused. The sale deed was agreed to be executed/registered on or before 15.5.2003. The complainant claimed that respondent became dishonest, did not execute the pointed sale deed and sold the land in question, through the medium of sale deeds dated 23.6.2003 and 27.5.2004 to subsequent vendees Shri Bhagwan, Shish Ram, Umed and Raj Niwas sons of Sultan Singh. Consequently, the complainant filed the civil suit for specific performance of indicated agreement to sell, which was stated