SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 195

M.M.S.BEDI
Rupinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Harjinder Kaur – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr.I.S. Parmar, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Ashok Sharma Nabhewala, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. M.M.S. Bedi, J.: (Oral) - Petitioners seek transfer of complaint under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, (for short ‘the Act’) titled Harjinder Kaur Vs. Rupinder Kaur and others, from the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambala to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Ludhiana.

2. Petitioner No.2 & 3 are the parents of petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.4 is brother of petitioner No.1. Respondent is the mother-in-law of petitioner No.1.

3. Copy of complaint under Section 12 of the Act, Annexure P1, indicates that Harjinder Kaur as aggrieved person has claimed that she is an old lady having been harassed by the petitioner Rupinder Kaur, her daughter-in-law and other petitioners who are related to petitioner No.1. She claims that she had been beaten by the petitioners at Ambala. She has claimed protection order under Section 18 read with Section 19 of the Act and monetary compensation. It appears that she has got domestic incident report prepared from the Protection Officer.

4. Petitioners have prayed for transfer of the complaint on the ground that other litigation between petitioner No.1 and her husband is pending at




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top