PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL & ARUN PALLI, JJ.
Paramjit Kumar Saroya – Appellant
Vs.
Union of India and another – Respondents
CWP No. 7282 of 2010
Decided On : 28/05/2014
MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT, 2007 - PROVISIONS NEEDING A RELOOK - RIGHT OF APPEAL OF AN AFFECTED PARTY OTHER THAN THE SENIOR CITIZEN OR PARENT - RIGHT TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION - IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE IN CWP-12340-2010 (ANNEXURE P-4).
Fact of the Case:
The case involves two writ petitions challenging the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (the Act). The petitioners, a grandson and his mother, were aggrieved by an order of the Sub Divisional Magistrate granting maintenance to the grandfather, respondent No. 4, from the grandson and his father, respondent No. 6. The petitioners contended that the grandfather had been forcibly kicked out of the house by the petitioners and that the other sons of the grandfather were not providing him food. The grandfather alleged that his son, respondent No. 6, was living in Italy and that the petitioners had locked his room.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the provisions of the Act needed to be re-examined in light of the ground reality and the experience of working with the Act. The Court held that the right to appeal under Section 16 of the Act was conferred on any aggrieved party, not just the senior citizen or parent. The Court also held that Section 17 of the Act, which barred legal representation, could not be applied to proceedings under the Act after Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961, came into force on 15 June 2011. The Court dismissed the challenge to the impugned order of the Sub Divisional Magistrate, finding that the order was justified on the facts of the case.
Issues: 1. Whether the right of appeal under Section 16 of the Act was conferred only on the senior citizen or parent, or also on other affected parties. 2. Whether Section 17 of the Act, which barred legal representation, could be applied to proceedings under the Act after Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961, came into force.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The right of appeal under Section 16 of the Act is conferred on any aggrieved party, not just the senior citizen or parent. This is evident from the language of the section, which does not restrict the right of appeal to senior citizens or parents. Additionally, the purpose of the Act is to protect the rights of senior citizens and parents, and this purpose would be undermined if only senior citizens or parents had the right to appeal orders made under the Act. 2. Section 17 of the Act, which barred legal representation, could not be applied to proceedings under the Act after Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961, came into force on 15 June 2011. Section 30 of the Advocates Act confers a right on advocates to practise before all courts and tribunals, including tribunals constituted under the Act. This right cannot be taken away by a provision in a subsequent statute, such as Section 17 of the Act.
Final Decision: The Court dismissed the challenge to the impugned order of the Sub Divisional Magistrate, finding that the order was justified on the facts of the case.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.
The changing norms of a society raise various problems. Our society, possibly more in the urban areas, is today faced with the ground reality of a unitary family, rather than a joint family where different generations live together. There are various causes for this easier movement for employment, requirement of greater privacy of the younger generation, the ability and the need to lead their lives etc. Simultaneously, the kind of welfare measures and support system required for the parents and aged persons have not kept pace with it as may be in the western countries. There is absence of social security system to take care of the older generation. And this is coupled with longevity as a consequence of better medical assistance.
2. One of the steps taken by the Legislature in support of the parents and senior citizens is the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). However, in the urgent need for the said enactment, we do feel that possibly the fine tuning of certain provisions has escaped attention as is being elucidated by us hereinafter.
3. The very statement of objects and reasons of the said Act has referred to the traditional norms and values of the Indian society which laid stress on providing care for the elderly, but due to the withering of the joint family system, a large number of elderly are not being looked after by their family. It is observed that ageing has become a major social challenge and there is a need to give more attention to the care and protection for the older persons. It is perceived that the procedure for claiming maintenance under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Cr. P.C.) is time consuming as well as expensive and, thus, the need to have a simple, inexpensive and speedy provisions to claim maintenance for the parents.
4. However, while framing the provisions of the said Act, the Legislature has gone much beyond the aspect of maintenance as rights in property have become involved with that aspect not only affecting the senior citizens and their progenies-inter se rights, but even capable of affecting third party rights. Thus, the matter is not so simple as the statement of objects and reasons states, but on the other hand, there are certain provisions which are bound to give rise to more complex legal issues where rights in immovable properties are sought to be negated on pleas such as fraud, coercion and undue influence. In fact, even presumptions are sought to be drawn by introducing a deeming provision in certain situation.
PROVISIONS OF THE ACT NEEDING A RELOOK:
5. We would like to delve in a little more detail qua the over all scheme of the said Act to appreciate the controversy at hand. Section 2(a) while dealing with the definition of children includes son, daughter, grandson and grand-daughter, but excludes a minor. The definition is, thus, expansive and puts the obligation not only on the next generation, but even on a generation thereafter even if the next generation is present. Similarly, the definition of property in Section 2(f) is also expansive to include movable or immovable, ancestral or self-acquired, tangible or intangible including rights and interests in such property. Thus, all aspects of property are sought to be roped in. The definition clauses contained in Section 2 of the said Act are followed by Section 3 which gives the provisions of the Act an overriding effect notwithstanding anything contained inconsistent therewith in any other enactment.
6. Maintenance of parents and senior citizens is contained in Chapter II starting from Section 4. The obligation of the children or relative to maintain a senior citizen extends to the needs of a senior citizen to lead a normal life. The provisions have also taken into consideration that the next generation inherits the properties from their parents and yet are unwilling during the life time of the
Aeltemesh Rein, Advocate, Supreme Court of India v. Union of India and others
A.K. Roy v. Union of India and another
Board of Muslim Wakfs, Rajasthan v. Radha Kishan and others
Carew and Co. Ltd. v. Union of India Krishna Iyer
D.R Venkatachalam v. Dy. Transport Commr.
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. v. Essar Power Ltd.
Gujarat v. Gujarat Kishan Mazdoor Panchayat
Lingappa Pochanna Appealwar v. State of Maharashtra and another
N. Kannadasan v. Ajoy Khose and others
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Nusli Neville Wadia
Rishabh Agro Industries Ltd. v. P.N.B. Capital Services Ltd.
Surjit Singh Kalra v. Union of India
Smt. Hemlata Kantilal Shah v. State of Maharashtra and another
Unique Butyle Tube Industries (P) Ltd. v. U.P. Financial Corporation and others
Union of India and Ors. v. Filip Tiago De Gama of Vedem Vasco De Gama
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.