SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 225

RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Sangeeta – Appellant
Versus
Om Prakash Balyan – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J.

In this petition, petitioner has assailed the order dated 12.06.2014 (Annexure P-4) passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak vide which order dated 25-2-2014 (Annexure P-2) passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Rohtak was set aside.

2. Marriage of the petitioner was sole-mnised with late Satish Kumar Balyan son of Sh. Om Parkash Balyan-respondent No.1 on 14.01.2000. One daughter Lokansha took birth from their wedlock on 26.02.2004. Husband of the petitioner died on 06.06.2009. Petitioner alleged that she along with her minor daughter lived with respondent No.1 in House No.28-A/22 Luxmi Nagar, Rohtak till 20-2-2010.

3. The petitioner filed complaint under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as ' the Act) against the respondent-Om Parkash Balyan and one Ram Kumar Nara alleging that petitioner and her minor daughter have been thrown out of the house.

4. Judicial Magistrate Ist Class Rohtak passed an order dated 25-2-2014 as an interim relief that at this stage plea of respondents that house is not shared house cannot be entertained for want of prima facie proof to that effect and granted inter





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top