Mr. K. Kannan J.: (Oral) - Both the revision petitions refer to the same subject mater. They also arise out of interim orders passed in the same suit and hence they are taken up together. C.R. No.1478 of 2012 is at the instance of the plaintiff, who sought for amendment of the plaint contending two important matters. One, the description of the property given in the plaint contain some typographical error with reference to the khasra numbers and it did not reproduce correctly the khasra numbers as found in the agreement of sale and therefore, the description of property would require to be corrected. The second amendment which the plaintiff was seeking was that the agreement dated 16.12.2005 was sought to be enforced and the amendment was sought to the effect that the right of the plaintiff was in the manner protected in the subsequent document which had made reference to the earlier document. One of the parties in the agreement dated 16.12.2005 was not even party in the subsequent agreement dated 09.04.2007.

2. The suit was filed on 08.04.2010 and the written statement was filed on 14.09.2010. The application for amendment was filed on 09.10.2010 that is, even before the i