M.M.S.BEDI
Rohtas Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Satparkash – Respondent
Mr. M.M.S. Bedi, J.: (Oral) - This is plaintiffs’ revision petition filed against the order passed by the trial Court dismissing their application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for impleading Director of Suman Villas Private Limited as additional defendant on the ground that defendant Nos.3 & 4 had sold the suit property to the said company, claiming that the said company would be a necessary party required to enable the Court to effectually and completely adjudicate upon and settle all the questions involved in the suit. The trial Court dismissed the application on the ground that the plaintiffs-petitioners want to prolong the proceedings.
2. Brief facts, relevant for the decision of the present revision petition, are that the plaintiffs have filed a suit for specific performance against defendant Nos.1 & 2 for specific performance of agreement of sale regarding the property mentioned in para 1 of the plaint on the basis of agreement of sale dated 14.6.2005 and the sale deed was to be executed on the date fixed for registration i.e., 14.10.2005. It was pleaded that the defendants Nos.1 & 2 have executed an illegal sale deed dated 21.12.2005 in favour of defendant Nos.3 & 4 reg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.