SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 399

RAJ RAHUL GARG
Jaswinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Surjeet Singh Chaudhary, DAG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT :

Mrs. Raj Rahul Garg, J.: - Jaswinder Kaur wife of Baljinder Singh assailed the judgment of conviction dated 01.12.2013 and order on sentence of even date rendered by Sh. J. S. Bhinder, Judge, Special Court, Hoshiarpur whereby the appellant-accused was convited for keeping 20 KG of poppy husk and thereby committing offence punishable under Section 15 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘NDPS Act’) and sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 1 year and 6 months and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-. In default of payment of fine to further undergo RI for two months.

2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant-accused stated that he does not contest the findings recorded by the learned trial court on merits of the case stating that he would feel satisfied if the sentence of Jaswinder Kaur, appellant-accused, is reduced to the one already undergone as she has already suffered a lot.

3. Under the above mentioned circumstances, I need not mention the detailed facts of the case as the same have already been mentioned in the judgment of the learned trial court. Tersely, as per prosecution case, on 03.08.2009 at about 6.00 PM, SI B








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top