SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(P&H) 1558

RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Bansal Trading and Another – Appellant
Versus
Dr. Viranmol Singh Toor – Respondent


Rakesh Garg, J.

1. This judgment shall dispose of two revision petitions viz. C.R. No. 4525 of 2013 titled as Bansal Trading and another v. Dr. Viranmal Singh Toor and others and C.R. No. 4648 of 2013 titled as Bharat Gulati v. Dr. Viranmal Singh Toor and others, as eviction of the petitioners in both the petitions has been ordered from the demised premises on an application filed by the respondent-landlords; the premises in dispute are part of one building; and the grounds raised in these revision petitions are common and are on similar facts. However, the facts are taken from CR No. 4525 of 2013 for convenience sake. The respondents-landlords filed a petition under Section 13B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as, the Act) seeking ejectment of the petitioners from the demised premises (i.e. shop located on ground floor of SCO No. 42-43- 44, Sector 17-A, Chandigarh) being Non Resident Indians, who required the demised premises for their own personal use and occupation.

2. It has been specifically stated in the eviction petition that the respondents are Indians by birth and fall within the definition of Non Resident Indian as contained under
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top