SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(P&H) 1576

RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Charanjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Allied Properties – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :Mr. Vijay Lath, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Anuj Raura, Advocate

Rakesh Garg, J.

1. This is tenant's revision petition against the order dated 7.5.2013 of the Appellate Authority whereby during the pendency of appeal against the order of eviction dated 16.4.2013, the prayer for stay of dispossession has been declined. The eviction petition was allowed vide order dated 16.4.2013 by observing as under:-

Keeping in view the findings on the issues above; the petition stands allowed and the respondent is ordered to be evicted from the demised premises forthwith and is directed to hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to petitioner forthwith. Failing which the petitioner shall be entitled to get the possession as per law. Memo of costs be prepared. File be consigned to record room.

2. Petitioner has filed an appeal against the aforesaid order which is pending before the Appellate Authority. During the pendency of the appeal, appellant has prayed for staying his dispossession from the demised premises which has been declined by the Appellate Authority which reads thus:-

After having heard both the sides at length, I have come to a conclusion that the learned Trial Court has observed that the landlord-respondent firm has been able to prove















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top