RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Charanjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Allied Properties – Respondent
1. This is tenant's revision petition against the order dated 7.5.2013 of the Appellate Authority whereby during the pendency of appeal against the order of eviction dated 16.4.2013, the prayer for stay of dispossession has been declined. The eviction petition was allowed vide order dated 16.4.2013 by observing as under:-
Keeping in view the findings on the issues above; the petition stands allowed and the respondent is ordered to be evicted from the demised premises forthwith and is directed to hand over the vacant possession of the demised premises to petitioner forthwith. Failing which the petitioner shall be entitled to get the possession as per law. Memo of costs be prepared. File be consigned to record room.
2. Petitioner has filed an appeal against the aforesaid order which is pending before the Appellate Authority. During the pendency of the appeal, appellant has prayed for staying his dispossession from the demised premises which has been declined by the Appellate Authority which reads thus:-
After having heard both the sides at length, I have come to a conclusion that the learned Trial Court has observed that the landlord-respondent firm has been able to prove
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.