Ajay Kumar Mittal, J.

1. The tenant-petitioner has preferred this revision petition against the order dated 31.8.2007 passed by the appellate authority whereby the appellate authority while reversing the findings dated 12.6.2006 of the Rent Controller had ordered his eviction. The facts necessary for adjudication of the present revision petition as narrated therein are that originally Uttam Singh was the owner of the property in dispute and the same had come to the share of the respondent. The property in dispute was held to be rented out by Uttam Singh @ ` 400/- per month by the Civil Court. Uttam Singh died on 20.11.1997 and the petitioner had been admitting the respondent to be the owner and landlord of the shop in dispute. The tenant was in arrears of rent since August, 1997. The landlord had bona fide requirement of the shop in dispute for his own use and purpose as the said property was rented out to the tenant long back. The landlord was running a shoe shop on the Eastern side. Previously the shop in dispute was the part of main shop. Accordingly, the landlord filed a eviction petition on the grounds of non-payment of arrears of rent and personal necessity. In pursuance there

Click Here to Read the rest of this document