SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 509

AMIT RAWAL
Ram Dulari – Appellant
Versus
Industrial Tribunal, Ludhiana – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :Vikas Singh, Advocate

Amit Rawal, J.:-

The petitioner-workman has approached this Court by invoking extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, for quashing the part of the Award dated 22.11.2011 (Annexure P-2), whereby, the petitioner has been denied the relief of reinstatement with all consequential benefits but only a compensation of Rs. 10,000/- has been awarded.

2. The workman has raised her grievance on the premise that she was employed as Mali with the respondent-Management on compassionate ground and joined services of respondent-Management as Mali on 1.6.2000 and continuously worked upto 3.7.2001 when her services were illegally terminated on 4.7.2001 without serving any notice or charge sheet. At the time of termination, she was drawing a salary Rs. 1800/- per month. The workman on account of her illegal termination, raised an industrial dispute and the matter was referred to the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Ludhiana. Before the Industrial Tribunal, respondent-Management heavily placed reliance on circular dated 1.6.2001, a copy of which has been annexed as Annexure P-4, to contend that in view of the circular issued by the Government of Punjab, the





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top