ANITA CHAUDHRY
Ravinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau – Respondent
1. The petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR No. RC3(A)/2005 dated 12.04.2005, registered under Sections 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(e) of Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 109 IPC. The prayer made herein is to quash the FIR and the final report presented by the prosecutors.
2. Baldev Singh Sandhu, posted as Commissioner of Income Tax (Computer Operation) along with his wife(petitioner), brother, father and mother have been named in the final report prepared under Section 173 Cr.P.C. The officer is accused of alleged acquisition of disproportionate assets. The basic stand taken by the petitioner is that the family members and the extended family have been arrayed as an accused when only one of them was a public servant. The other plea taken by the petitioner is that the FIR was registered in 2005 and CBI took seven years to complete the investigation.
3. The petitioner had submitted that in the initial report prepared in July, 2009, the prosecutor had calculated the disproportionate assets of the extended family to the tune of 244%, while the individual disproportionate assets/expenditure relating to the husband o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.