SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 799

DARSHAN SINGH
Sudarshan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Manish Manchanda – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :Vaibhav Sehgal, Advocate

Darshan Singh, J.:-

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (here-in-after called 'Cr.P.C.') for quashing the order dated 22.04.2015 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ludhiana in Criminal Complaint No. 417/2 of 17.03.2011, whereby the application moved by the petitioner-accused for sending the cheques in question to the Director Forensic Laboratory has been dismissed.

2. The petitioner is facing the trial in a complaint filed by the respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (here-in-after called 'the Act') and Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (here-in-after called 'IPC'). At the stage of the defence evidence, he moved application for sending the cheques in question to the Director Forensic Laboratory for the purpose of determining the age of the writing in the body of the cheque in terms of the signature, amount in the words and figure for determining the age of the ink used for filling the same in the cheques in question as the stand of the petitioner is that the cheques in question were procured as a security and the same were issued in the year 2008 and have been misused








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top