SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 731

RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Madan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Harpal Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :J.P. Sharma, Advocate

Rameshwar Singh Malik, J.:-

CRM No. 8638 of 2014

1. Applicant seeks condonation of delay of 54 days in filing the accompanying appeal.

2. After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, instant application is allowed for the reasons stated therein. Delay of 54 days in filing the present accompanying appeal is condoned.

3. CRM stands disposed of.

4. Present appeal is directed against the judgment of acquittal dated 11.12.2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions, Narnaul, whereby the accused-respondent was acquitted of the charges framed against him under Sections 323/341/506 of the Indian Penal Code ('IPC for short) and Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 ('SC/ST Act' for short).

5. Brief facts of the case, as recorded by the learned trial court in para 2 of its impugned judgment of acquittal, are that on 7.4.2013 Madan Singh son of Chandu Ram, Sarpanch of village Kheri, came in the police station and submitted a written complaint stating therein that on 7.4.2013, he along with Vikrarm son of Jairam Singh and Netarpal Singh son of Banwari Lal was coming towards his village, after having a meeting in the village Mandir rega








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top