L.N.MITTAL
Ram Dass Bagga – Appellant
Versus
Ram Chander – Respondent
Tenant Ram Dass Bagga has filed this revision petition under Section 15 (6) of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 (in short – the Act), having failed before both the Authorities below.
2. Respondent-landlord Ram Chander filed ejectment petition under Section 13 of the Act against tenant-petitioner seeking ejectment of the petitioner from demised shops no.2 and 3, on the ground of nonpayment of arrears of rent and bona fide requirement of the demised property for the landlord for his own business. Ground of non-payment of rent was not pressed in view of payment made by the tenant. As regards personal necessity, it was pleaded that the landlord has retired from service in Saraswati Sugar Mills and was doing no work, and therefore, he wanted to start his independent business in the demised shops.
3. The tenant controverted the ground of personal necessity of the landlord. It was also alleged that the disputed shops were let out by Kamlesh Kumari wife of the landlord and later on, both of them started receiving rent from the tenant-petitioner. It was also alleged that Kamlesh Kumari filed ejectment petition regarding adjacent shop no.1 in t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.