K.Kannan, J. (Oral);—

1. All the three revision petitions pertain to the same premises and they have been brought together with the consent of both counsel. The subject matter in Civil Revision No.756 of 1996 has been originally instituted at the instance of the Punjab Khadi Mandal and after the formation of Kashetariya Punjab Khadi Mandal, it was also added as a party. This petition for eviction was dismissed on a technical ground that the requirement of a landlord of a non-residential purpose was impermissible. The subsequent petition came to be filed by Kashetariya Punjab Khadi Mandal which is the subject of petition in Civil Revision No.1777 of 1999. The petition for eviction by the Kashetariya Mandal was for the same purpose of personal need when they were contending that the portion of SCF 9 which was in the occupation of tenants was also required, since the existing remaining portion of the property in the hands of the landlord was not sufficient. The third revision petition was at the instance of the tenants in Civil Revision No.5547 of 1999 in so far as the tenants' contention, which was rejected, that the subsequent petition filed by the landlord was not maintainable, bein

Click Here to Read the rest of this document