SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(P&H) 1705

NIRMALJIT KAUR
Subash Nagpal and Another – Appellant
Versus
Neeraj Kakkar – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Sanjay Vij, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. S.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the respondent.

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the complaint dated 29.10.2009 (P-1) titled complaint case No.128 of 2009 Neeraj Kakkar Versus Subash Nagpal etc. filed under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 read with Section 420 IPC and the summoning order dated 8.4.2010 (P-3) passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, District Court Ferozepur.

2. Admittedly on 28.9.2010, petitioner No.1 through his counsel had appeared before the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Ferozepur and without prejudice to the challenge of the complaint on merits, filed an application under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, towards the compounding of the offence. It is duly informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is willing to pay the entire cheque amount and also offered to pay the same vide cheque bearing No.021353 drawn from HDFC Bank, K.G. Marg, New Delhi for an amount of Rs.19,394/-. However, the complainant refused to accept the said amount and stated that he would like to proceed further with the said complaint.

3. Accordingly, the petitioner has filed the present petition in which notice of motion









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top