RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Ram Paul – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Kumar – Respondent
This is tenant’s revision petition challenging the judgment dated 21.10.2011 passed by the Appellate Authority, whereby while accepting the appeal against the order dated 19.12.2008 of the Rent Controller, Ludhiana, eviction of the petitioner has been ordered from the demised premises on the ground of personal necessity of the respondent-landlord.
Respondent-landlord Piara Lal (since deceased) sought ejectment of the petitioner on various grounds including that of personal necessity of the landlord. The Rent Controller, vide order dated 19.12.2008, dismissed the ejectment petition holding that the respondent has failed to prove his case. However, the respondentlandlord filed an appeal against the aforesaid order and the same was accepted vide order dated 21.10.2011 of the Appellate Authority on the ground that demised premises is required by the landlord for his bonafide personal necessity and the petitioner was directed to hand over vacant possession of the shop in dispute to the Legal Representatives of appellant-Piara Lal.
The petitioner-tenant has challenged the aforesaid judgment dated 21.10.2011 on the ground that in the ejectment petition, the respondent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.