SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 1489

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, SNEH PRASHAR
Sakshi – Appellant
Versus
Abhinandan Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :Ajay Kaushik, Advocate

Sneh Prashar, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 10.07.2014 vide which the application under Section 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short "the Act of 1955") seeking permission to file a petition for divorce by mutual consent before expiry of statutory period of one year of the marriage, filed together by appellant-wife Sakshi and respondent-husband Abhinandan Sharma, was dismissed. The facts quoted in the impugned order are as under:--

"Appellant Smt. Sakshi was married to respondent Abhinandan Sharma on 08.02.2014. After the marriage, they resided together as husband and wife at Ludhiana upto 16.03.2014. It was alleged that the marriage could not be consummated because of incompatibility of temperaments and certain misunderstanding between the parties. Ultimately, both the parties fell apart and were residing separately since 16.03.2014. All efforts made for reconciliation and reunion failed and ultimately to resolve the dispute the parties by way of mutual agreement dated 01.07.2014 decided to seek divorce by mutual consent invoking the provisions of Section 13 of the Act of 1955. Alongwith the petition, an application under Section 14 of the Act of 19











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top