SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 1473

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, SNEH PRASHAR
Manpreet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Jasbir Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :S.S. Sarwara, Advocate

Sneh Prashar, J.

1. This appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act is by Manpreet Kaur appellant-wife assailing the judgment and decree dated 10.07.2014 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, SAS Nagar Mohali, in HMA Case No. 19 dated 22.02.2011 filed by Jasbir Singh respondent-husband. The facts extracted from the record, which need elaboration are as under:

Jasbir Singh-respondent was married to Manpreet Kaurappellant on 10.02.2008 at Rajpura as per Sikh rites and ceremonies. After the marriage, Manpreet Kaur lived at her matrimonial home for 10-15 days and then went to meet her parents and stayed there for 10 days. After she was brought back to the matrimonial home, her mother came to meet her regularly and gave some medicines to her on the pretext that there was some infection in her stomach. Two months thereafter, Manpreet Kaur again went to her parents place and lived there for one month. When Jasbir Singh went to see her, he found that she was not well and he brought her back. Thereafter, she would become aggressive towards him and his family members and used to blindly refuse to prepare meals for them. In the second week of July 2008, when Manpreet Kaur was























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top