SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 1472

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, SNEH PRASHAR
Suman – Appellant
Versus
Subhash – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :Tara Chand Dhanwal, Advocate

Sneh Prashar, J.

1. A petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter to be referred as "the Act of 1955") was filed by Smt. Suman, petitioner-appellant (hereinafter to be referred as "the appellant") seeking dissolution of her marriage with her husband Subhash-respondent (hereinafter to be referred as "the respondent") on the ground that she had been treated with cruelty and also that she had been deserted without any reasonable cause by the respondent. On notice of the petition, the respondent appeared but when the petition was fixed for filing of written reply by him, he committed default in appearance and was proceeded against ex parte . The appellant led ex parte evidence. Besides stepping into the witness box herself as PW1 and making a statement in the shape of her affidavit Ex.PW1/A, she also examined her brother Binder, who corroborated her version through his affidavit Ex.PW2/A.

2. The evidence led by the appellant did not weigh with learned Additional District Judge, Hisar and the petition was dismissed vide judgment and decree dated 03.01.2009.

3. Feeling aggrieved, the appellant preferred the instant appeal.

4. Heard the submissions made by Shri Tara












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top