1. By way of this appeal, appellant-Rajni Goyal assailed the judgment and decree dated 25.01.2014 passed by learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Bathinda, vide which H.M.A. case No. 27 dated 01.03.2011 filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short 'the Act of 1955') by her husband Amit Kumar- petitioner was allowed and a decree of divorce dissolving their marriage was passed.

2. The facts which need elaboration are as under:-

Appellant Rajni Goyal was married to respondent Amit Kumar on 12.06.2009 at Village Chanarthal, District Bathinda as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. The couple resided together at Bathinda for a short period but no child was born out of the wedlock.

It was averred by Amit Kumar that during the period Rajni Goyal stayed at the matrimonial home, she used to receive telephonic calls from her paramour namely, Manpreet Singh (respondent no.2). She lived in adultery and her paramour threatened him of dire consequences which caused him grave mental agony. Pleading about the general behaviour of Rajni Goyal, Amit Kumar alleged that she was very harsh and rude towards him; she would create scene over trivial matters and