SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(P&H) 1471

RAJIVE BHALLA, SURINDER GUPTA
Bijender Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :Rishi Malhotra, Advocate
For the Respondents: Baldev Singh, Addl. A.G.

Surinder Gupta, J.

1. This appeal has been preferred against judgment of conviction dated 17.12.2009 and order of sentence dated 21.12.2009 passed by Sessions Judge, Bhiwani, whereby appellant was convicted for offences punishable under Sections 302 of Indian Penal Code (for short 'I.P.C.') and 27(1) of Arms Act, 1959 and sentenced as follows:-

Convicted for the offence punishable under Section Sentence

Rigorous imprisonment Fine

302 IPC For life Rs. 20000 in default of paument of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for two for two year.

27(1) Arms Act, 1959 Three years Rs. 10000 in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.

An F.I.R. No. 177 dated 02.10.2008 was registered at Police Station Badhra, District Bhiwani on the statement of complainant Satyawati wife of Bije Singh @ Sanjay. In her statement (Ex. P15), she had stated that her husband has three brothers namely, Bijender (appellant), Ved Parkash and Rajbir. Her husband wanted to sell two killas of land of his share but appellant Bijender was stopping him from doing so. The appellant along with his family was residing at Rajgarh (Rajasthan) and w





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top